Item | Information |
---|---|
CAS RN | 79-34-5 |
Chemical Name | 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (Acetylene tetrachloride) |
Substance ID | H26-B-066, - |
Classification year (FY) | FY2014 |
Ministry who conducted the classification | Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW)/Ministry of the Environment (MOE) |
New/Revised | Revised |
Classification result in other fiscal year | FY2010 FY2006 |
Download of Excel format | Excel file |
Item | Information |
---|---|
Guidance used for the classification (External link) | GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government (FY2013 revised edition) |
UN GHS document (External link) | UN GHS document |
Definitions/Abbreviations (Excel file) | Definitions/Abbreviations |
Model Label by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
Model SDS by MHLW (External link) | MHLW Website (in Japanese Only) |
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) | eChemPortal |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Explosives | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule. |
2 | Flammable gases (including chemically unstable gases) | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
3 | Aerosols | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Not aerosol products. |
4 | Oxidizing gases | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
5 | Gases under pressure | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
6 | Flammable liquids | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It is not combustible (ICSC (2005)). |
7 | Flammable solids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
8 | Self-reactive substances and mixtures | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | There are no chemical groups present in the molecule associated with explosive or self-reactive properties. |
9 | Pyrophoric liquids | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It is not combustible (ICSC (2005)). |
10 | Pyrophoric solids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
11 | Self-heating substances and mixtures | Not classified |
- |
- | - | It is not combustible (ICSC (2005)). |
12 | Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | The chemical structure of the substance does not contain metals or metalloids (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At). |
13 | Oxidizing liquids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | The substance is an organic compound containing chlorine (but not fluorine or oxygen) which is chemically bonded only to carbon or hydrogen. |
14 | Oxidizing solids | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
15 | Organic peroxides | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Organic compounds containing no bivalent -O-O- structure in the molecule |
16 | Corrosive to metals | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | No data available. Besides, there is information that aluminum is inappropriate as a container and that steel is resistant (Hommel (1991)). |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acute toxicity (Oral) | Category 4 |
Warning |
H302 |
P301+P312
P362+P364 P264 P270 P330 P501 |
There are 9 reports (6 data) of LD50 values of 200 mg/kg (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010)), 250 mg/kg (ATSDR (2008)), 319 mg/kg (ATSDR (2008), ACGIH (7th, 2001)), 330 mg/kg (ATSDR (2008)), 800 mg/kg (ATSDR (2008)), 1,000 mg/kg (CICAD 3 (1998)), 250-330 mg/kg (CICAD 3 (1998)), 200-800 mg/kg, (IRIS TR (2010)), and 250-800 mg/kg (SIDS (2005)) for rats. Based on the GHS classification guidance for the Japanese government, it was classified in Category 4 to which the larger number of data (4 cases) corresponds. Besides, 2 cases correspond to Category 3. New information sources (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010), IRIS TR (2010), ATSDR (2008), SIDS (2005)) were added, and the category was revised. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Dermal) | Not classified |
- |
- | - | Based on multiple reports of LD50 values within the range of 3,990-8,200 mg/kg for rabbits (ATSDR (2008), SIDS (2005), ACGIH (7th, 2001), CICAD 3 (1998)), it was classified as "Not classified." |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) | Not applicable |
- |
- | - | Liquid (GHS definition) |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) | Category 3 |
Danger |
H331 |
P304+P340
P403+P233 P261 P271 P311 P321 P405 P501 |
Based on reports of LC50 values (4 hours) of 640 ppm (SIDS (2005)), 1,000 ppm (PATTY (6th, 2012), ACGIH (7th, 2001)), and 1,200 ppm (IRIS TR (2010), ATSDR (2008), SIDS (2005)) for rats, it was classified in Category 3. Besides, since LC50 values were lower than 90% of the saturated vapour concentration (6,078 ppm), the reference value in units of ppm was applied as a vapour without a mist. |
1 | Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
2 | Skin corrosion/irritation | Category 2 |
Warning |
H315 |
P302+P352
P332+P313 P362+P364 P264 P280 P321 |
There is a report that it showed severe irritation with the primary skin irritation index of 6 (maximum value of 8) when 0.01 mL of the undiluted liquid of this substance was applied by open patch to the skin of rabbits for 24 hours (SIDS (2005)). In addition, in other tests with rabbits, there is a report that hyperemia, edema and severe blisters were observed (ATSDR (2008)), and there is a report that since erythema was observed, and the skin primary irritation score was 2.6 (maximum value of 8), it was moderately irritating (IUCLID (2000)). From the above results, it was classified in Category 2. |
3 | Serious eye damage/eye irritation | Category 2A |
Warning |
H319 |
P305+P351+P338
P337+P313 P264 P280 |
There is a report that it was "irritating" based on the eye irritation score of 42.5/110 in a test in which 0.1 mL of the undiluted liquid of this substance was applied to rabbits' eyes (SIDS (2005)). There are reports that "it was irritating" by exposure of guinea pigs to the vapour (ACGIH (7th, 2001), CICAD 3 (1998), ATSDR (2008)). Moreover, irritation was observed in humans (ATSDR (2008)). From the above results, it was classified in Category 2A. |
4 | Respiratory sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
4 | Skin sensitization | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. |
5 | Germ cell mutagenicity | Category 2 |
Warning |
H341 |
P308+P313
P201 P202 P280 P405 P501 |
As for in vivo, it was negative in a dominant lethal test with rats, weakly positive (female) and negative (male) in a chromosomal aberration test with rats bone marrow cells, positive in a peripheral blood micronucleus test with mice (male and female), positive or negative in an unscheduled DNA synthesis test with mouse hepatocytes, and positive in DNA bond tests with the liver, kidney, lung and stomach of mice and rats (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010), ATSDR (2008), SIDS (2005), NTP DB (Access on September 2014), IARC 71 (1999)). As for in vitro, it was positive or negative in bacterial reverse mutation tests, negative in gene mutation tests and chromosomal aberration tests with cultured mammalian cells, and positive in sister chromatid exchange tests with cultured mammalian cells (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010), OEL Documentations (Japan Society For Occupational Health (JSOH)), 1984, SIDS (2005), ATSDR (2008), CICAD 3 (1998), NTP DB (Access on September 2014)). From the above, according to the GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government, it was classified in Category 2. |
6 | Carcinogenicity | Category 2 |
Warning |
H351 |
P308+P313
P201 P202 P280 P405 P501 |
It was classified in Group 2B by IARC (IARC (2014), in A3 by ACGIH (ACGIH (7th, 2001)), HSDB (Access on August 2014)), and as C by EPA (EPA IRIS (1987), IRIS (2010), HSDB (Access on August 2014)). From the above, it was classified in Category 2. |
7 | Reproductive toxicity | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - |
No effects on male fertility and offspring were observed in a reproductive toxicity test with rats (mating exposed males with unexposed females) by the inhalation route (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010), ATSDR (2008), SIDS (2005), ACGIH (7th, 2001)). However, since this test was conducted with only 1 concentration (0 or 2 ppm), the reliability was poor. There are reports that decreases in the fetal body weight and resorptions were observed at doses where maternal toxicity (decreased body weight gain, death) was observed in a teratogenicity test (dose-finding study) with rats and mice by the oral route (feeding) (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010), SIDS (2005), NTP (1991)). It is described in SIDS (2005) that it is not possible to draw valid assessment from these limited data on developmental toxicity. There are reports that decreased testicular and epididymal weights, testicular atrophy, decreased sperm motility and altered estrous cycles were observed in repeated dose toxicity tests with rats and mice by the oral route (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010), SIDS (2005), CICAD 3 (1998)). However, its relevance to decreased body weight gain was pointed out (NTP TOX 49 (2004)), and no effects on the genetic organs were observed in further long-term tests (78 weeks) with rats and mice (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010), SIDS (2005), CICAD 3 (1998)). On the other hand, there were few data on the reproductive function and fertility. Therefore, it was classified as "Classification not possible" due to lack of data. |
8 | Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure | Category 1 (central nervous system, liver, kidney), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation, narcotic effects) |
Danger Warning |
H370
H335 H336 |
P308+P311
P260 P264 P270 P321 P405 P501 P304+P340 P403+P233 P261 P271 P312 |
This substance had respiratory tract irritation and narcotic effect (SIDS (2005), ACGIH (7th, 2001), ATSDR (2008), CICAD 3 (1998)). There is a description that the main effects of this substance were those on the central nervous system, liver and kidney (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010), ACGIH (7th, 2001), CICAD 3 (1998), PATTY (6th, 2012)). In humans, abdominal pain, cough, sore throat, headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, lethargy, confusion, tremors and convulsions were observed by the inhalation exposure, and abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting were observed in the oral ingestion. Additionally, although the route was unknown, in reports of cases of suicidal or accidental poisonings, and of exposure in workers or volunteers, effects on the central nervous system such as confusion, loss of equilibrium, drowsiness, convulsions, coma, tremor, dizziness, functional decline of the central nervous system, loss of consciousness, incoordination, anesthesia and somnolence, hepatic effects such as liver cytolysis, liver degeneration, hepatic congestion, hepatic necrosis, fatty degeneration, severe liver disorder, jaundice and liver enlargement, effects on the kidney such as renal tubular damage, pulmonary congestion, pulmonary edema, bleeding in the epicardium or endocardia, congestion in the esophagus or stomach mucosa, and death were reported (Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010), ACGIH (7th, 2001), CICAD 3 (1998), PATTY (6th, 2012), HSDB (Access on August 2014), OEL Documentations (Japan Society For Occupational Health (JSOH), 1984), SIDS (2005), ATSDR (2008)). As for experimental animals, after sub-lethal concentration exposure, the main target organs were the central nervous system, and there is a report of delayed anesthesia-like symptoms and the liver with degenerative lesions (observed at the end of the two-week observation period) (SIDS (2005)). Moreover, there are reports that reflex reactivity in mice was reduced by the inhalation exposure (30 minutes) at 1091 ppm (7.49 mg/L), and that a decrease in spontaneous motor activity was seen in rats by the inhalation exposure (6 hours) at 200 ppm (1.37 mg/L) (ACGIH (7th, 2001)). In addition, ataxia, prostration and narcosis were reported (ATSDR (2008)). From the above, since effects on the central nervous system, liver and kidney, respiratory tract irritation, narcotic effects in humans were regarded as effects, it was classified in Category 1 (central nervous system, liver, kidney), Category 3 (respiratory tract irritation, narcotic effects). Besides, since the effects on the lung (pulmonary congestion, pulmonary edema) were considered to be secondary effects, it was not adopted for category. |
9 | Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure | Category 1 (central nervous system, liver) |
Danger |
H372 |
P260
P264 P270 P314 P501 |
In an epidemiological study in which 380 Indian workers were occupationally exposed to this substance at concentrations of 63-686 mg/m3, symptoms on the central nervous system (tremor, headache, dizziness) and symptoms on the digestive system (loss of appetite, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain) were observed (ATSDR (2008), SIDS (2005), ACGIH (7th, 2001), CICAD 3 (1998), Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010)). In an epidemiological study in which Hungarian workers were exposed to this substance at concentrations of 10-1,700 mg/m3, it was described that about half of the workers were diagnosed with hepatitis in manipulation and hepatic function tests, and disorder of hepatic function and enlarged liver were observed in some workers, and symptoms such as loss of appetite, headache and stomach pain were observed (ATSDR (2008), SIDS (2005), ACGIH (7th, 2001), CICAD 3 (1998), Environmental Risk Assessment for Chemical Substances Vol.8 (Ministry of the Environment, 2010)). Based on the above descriptions, the central nervous system, liver and gastrointestinal tract were considered to be target organs. However, as for symptoms on the digestive system, it was described that specific symptoms were not associated with exposure concentrations, and these disappeared early after stopping exposure (ATSDR (2008)). Therefore, it was considered that qualitative and objective evidence was lacking in order to adopt the digestive system organs to be the specific target organ. As for experimental animals, based on descriptions that in tests with rats and mice dosed by feeding for 14 weeks, hepatic effects (hepatocellular vacuolization, hepatocyte hypertrophy, necrosis, pigmentation, increased serum ALT and SDH (sorbitol dehydrogenase)) were observed in rats at doses within the range of Category 2 (20-80 mg/kg/day), and that increased relative liver weight and elevated serum SDH were observed in mice at 80 mg/kg/day (IRIS (2010), ATSDR (2008), PATTY (6th, 2012)), the liver was regarded as a target organ. Moreover, in a test with rats dosed by feeding for 3 weeks, adding to hepatic effects (hepatocyte hypertrophy, vacuolation), lethargy as a symptom of the central nervous system was observed at doses corresponding to Category 2 (104-208 mg/kg/day (converted guidance value: 24-48 mg/kg/day)) (SIDS (2005), ATSDR (2008)). Additionally, though in a test with only 1 concentration, it was described that central nervous system depressing symptoms were observed in early period at 560 ppm (3,850 mg/m3: corresponding to "Not classified") in a 15-week inhalation exposure test with rats (SIDS (2005)). From the above, based on the hazardous findings in humans and experimental animals, it was classified in Category 1 (central nervous system, liver). |
10 | Aspiration hazard | Classification not possible |
- |
- | - | Classification not possible due to lack of data. Besides, although kinematic viscosity at 20 deg C was 1.11 mm2/sec (calculation value: HSDB (Access on August 2014)), it is not a "hydrocarbon," therefore, it was not applicable to the criteria for classification. |
Hazard class | Classification |
Pictogram Signal word |
Hazard statement (code) |
Precautionary statement (code) |
Rationale for the classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Acute) | - |
- |
- | - | - |
11 | Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Long-term) | - |
- |
- | - | - |
12 | Hazardous to the ozone layer | - |
- |
- | - | - |
|