GHS Classification Result

日本語で表示

GENERAL INFORMATION

Item Information
CAS number 634-93-5
Chemical name 2,4,6-Trichloroaniline
Substance ID 23A5181
Fiscal year of classification conducted FY2011
Classifier(s) (Ministries) Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (MHLW), Ministry of the Environment (MOE)
New/Revised New
Download in Excel format Excel file

REFERENCE INFORMATION

Item Information
Guidance used for classification (External link) Physical Hazards & Health Hazards: GHS Classification Guidance by the Japanese Government (July, 2010)
Environmental Hazards: UN GHS Document (4th revised edition)
Definitions / Abbreviations (Excel file) Definitions / Abbreviations
Model Label by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
Model SDS by MHLW (External link) MHLW Website (in Japanese Only)
OECD/eChemPortal (External link) eChemPortal

PHYSICAL HAZARDS

Hazard class Classification Pictogram
(Code: symbol)
Signal word
Code
(Hazard statement)
Code
(Precautionary statement)
Rationale for the classification
1 Explosives Not applicable - - - There are no chemical groups associated with explosive properties present in the molecule.
2 Flammable gases (including chemically unstable gases) Not applicable - - - "Solids" according to GHS definition.
3 Aerosols Not applicable - - - Not an aerosol product.
4 Oxidizing gases Not applicable - - - "Solids" according to GHS definition.
5 Gases under pressure Not applicable - - - "Solids" according to GHS definition.
6 Flammable liquids Not applicable - - - "Solids" according to GHS definition.
7 Flammable solids Classification not possible - - - No data.
8 Self-reactive substances and mixtures Classification not possible - - - It contains a chemical group associated with a self-reactive property (haloaniline), but the classification is not possible due to no data.
9 Pyrophoric liquids Not applicable - - - "Solids" according to GHS definition.
10 Pyrophoric solids Classification not possible - - - No data.
11 Self-heating substances and mixtures Classification not possible - - - No established test method suitable for solid substances with a melting point of 140 degrees C or lower.
12 Substances and mixtures which, in contact with water, emit flammable gases Not applicable - - - Not containing metals or semimetals (B, Si, P, Ge, As, Se, Sn, Sb, Te, Bi, Po, At).
13 Oxidizing liquids Not applicable - - - "Solids" according to GHS definition.
14 Oxidizing solids Not applicable - - - An organic compound does not contain oxygen or fluorine but contains chlorine which is not chemically bonded to elements other than carbon.
15 Organic peroxides Not applicable - - - An organic compound that does not contain -O-O- structure.
16 Corrosive to metals Classification not possible - - - No established test method suitable for solid substances.

HEALTH HAZARDS

Hazard class Classification Pictogram
(Code: symbol)
Signal word
Code
(Hazard statement)
Code
(Precautionary statement)
Rationale for the classification
1 Acute toxicity (Oral) Not classified - - - From an LD50 value of 2400 mg/kg for rats (HSDB (2003)), it was classified as "Not classified" in JIS classification (Category 5 in UN GHS classification).
1 Acute toxicity (Dermal) Classification not possible - - - No data.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases) Not applicable - - - "Solids" according to GHS definition.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours) Classification not possible - - - No data.
1 Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists) Classification not possible - - - No data.
2 Skin corrosion/irritation Classification not possible - - - No data.
3 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Classification not possible - - - No data.
4 Respiratory sensitization Classification not possible - - - No data.
4 Skin sensitization Classification not possible - - - No data.
5 Germ cell mutagenicity Classification not possible - - - The classification is not possible due to no in vivo test data.
Besides, as in vitro tests, a negative in an Ames test (NTP DB (1988)) and a negative in a chromosomal aberration test using CHL cells (Mutagenicity test data, Industrial Safety and Health Law, Supplement (1997), equivalent to List 2) were reported.
6 Carcinogenicity Classification not possible - - - The classification is not possible due to lack of data.
Besides, 5-month and 13-month diet administration tests in rats reported no effects. And an 18-month diet administration test in mice reported vascular tumors (12/16) and liver tumors (1/16) in males. (RTECS (2008), original literature: Journal of Environmental Pathology & Toxicology 2: 325-356, 1978)
7 Reproductive toxicity Classification not possible - - - No data.
8 Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure Classification not possible - - - No data.
9 Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure Classification not possible - - - No data.
10 Aspiration hazard Classification not possible - - - No data.

ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS

Hazard class Classification Pictogram
(Code: symbol)
Signal word
Code
(Hazard statement)
Code
(Precautionary statement)
Rationale for the classification
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Acute) Category 2
No pictogram

No signal word
H401
P273
P501
From 72-hour ErC50 = 3.7 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (Results of Eco-toxicity tests of chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan, 2005), it was classified in Category 2.
11 Hazardous to the aquatic environment (Long-term) Category 1

Warning
H410
P273
P391
P501
If chronic toxicity data are used, then it is classified in Category 1 from non-rapidly degradable (a degradation rate by BOD: 0 % (the existing chemicals survey program, 1982)) and 72-hour NOEC = 0.069 mg/L for algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) (Results of Eco-toxicity tests of chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan, 2005).
If acute toxicity data are used for trophic levels for which chronic toxicity data are lacking, then it is classified in Category 2 from non-rapidly degradable (a degradation rate by BOD: 0 % (the existing chemicals survey program, 1982)) and 48-hour EC50 = 4.3 mg/L for crustacea (Daphnia magna) (Results of Eco-toxicity tests of chemicals conducted by Ministry of the Environment in Japan, 2005).
It was classified in Category 1 by a comparison between the above results.
12 Hazardous to the ozone layer Classification not possible - - - This substance is not listed in Annexes to the Montreal Protocol.


NOTES:
* Classification was conducted by relevant Japanese Ministries in accordance with GHS Classification Guidance for the Japanese Government,
   and is intended to provide a reference for preparing GHS labelling and SDS for users.
* This is a provisional English translation of classification results and is subject to revision without notice.
* The responsibility for any resulting GHS labelling and SDS referenced from this site is with users.



Updated date:
2016/10/31 Addition of Rationale for the classification

List of GHS Classification Results