Hazard class
|
Classification
|
Symbol
|
Signal word
|
Hazard statement
|
Precautionary statement
|
Rationale for the classification
|
1
|
Acute toxicity (Oral)
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
1
|
Acute toxicity (Dermal)
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available. As relevant notes, its mixture with paraffin wax (CAS No. 8002-74-2) (1-to-1 ratio) has a rabbit LD50 value of 3600 mg/kg bw (IUCLID (2000)).
|
1
|
Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Gases)
|
Not applicable
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
The substance is a semi solid (Merck (14th, 2006)) and it is assumed to be a liquid at ordinary temperature.
|
1
|
Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Vapours)
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
1
|
Acute toxicity (Inhalation: Dusts and mists)
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
2
|
Skin corrosion/irritation
|
Not classified
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
According to Patty (5th, 2001), the substance is non-irritating, and it is documented to be used as a dermal test vehicle. Based on these reports, the substance was classified into "Not classified".
|
3
|
Serious eye damage/eye irritation
|
Category 2B
|
-
|
Warning
|
H320: Causes eye irritation
|
P305+P351+P338: IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. P337+P313: If eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. P264: Wash ... thoroughly after handling.
|
Since the substance was evaluated to be slightly irritating in rabbits (IUCLID, (2000)), it was classified into Category 2B.
|
4
|
Respiratory sensitization
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
4
|
Skin sensitization
|
Not classified
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Based on the following documents, the substance was classified into "Not classified": the substance was evaluated to be not sensitizing in humans (IUCLID (2000)); although dermatitis developed by repeated exposure, the substance was not sensitizing (IUCLID (2000)); and the substance is nonallergenic and is used as a dermal test vehicle (Patty (5th, 2001)).
|
5
|
Germ cell mutagenicity
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
6
|
Carcinogenicity
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
In mixed diet tests using rats (FDRL, about 3000 mg/kg/day), no signs of carcinogenicity were detected in the application of either two kinds of white substances or one yellow substance (color differences were due to the degree of refinement) (EHC 20 (1982)). Similarly, the 80-week dermal administration tests using mice that were treated with 25 or 50 mg did not find signs of carcinogenicity (IUCLID (2000)). In addition, according to Patty, the highly refined substance showed little or no signs of carcinogenicity (Patty (5th, 2001)). Referring to the EU classification, the substance of low refinement (yellow, amber, and brown vaseline) is for industrial use, and it sometimes contains polycyclic aromatics that are carcinogenic, and therefore, it is rated as Category 2 (equivalent to Category 1B based on the JIS classification criteria) (EU-Annex 1 (accessed in September 2008)). Overall, since information on low-refined, yellow substance is not available, the substance was classified into "Classification not possible".
|
7
|
Reproductive toxicity
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|
8
|
Specific target organ toxicity - Single exposure
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
In a skin test using rabbits that were exposed to 4 ml/kg for 24 hours, toxic symptoms (abnormalities found in autopsy or systemic effects) were not recognized. However, test substance was a mixture with paraffin (CAS No. 8002-74-2) (1-to-1 ratio) (IUCLID (2000)). Since the information gathered was of this test and a hypodermic administration test only (IUCLID (2000)), the substance was classified into "Classification not possible" due to lack of data.
|
9
|
Specific target organ toxicity - Repeated exposure
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
In 2-year mixed diet tests using rats (FDRL, about 3000 mg/kg/day, (90-day correction: 24000 mg/kg/day)), no toxic symptoms (abnormalities in behavior, mortality rate, blood items, urine, organs, and tissues) were detected in the application of either two kinds of white substances or one yellow substance (color differences were due to the degree of refinement) (IUCLID (2000)). This document indicates that the substance is to be rated as "Not classified" for oral administration; however, since no information on other routes is available, the substance was classified into "Classification not possible".
|
10
|
Aspiration hazard
|
Classification not possible
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
No data available.
|